Quellenverzeichnis

1. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (Hrsg.). Nationales Gesundheitsziel – Gesundheit rund um die Geburt. Berlin, 2017.
2. Zeitlin J, Mohangoo A, Delnord M, Cuttini M, Haidinger G, Alexander S, et al. The second European Perinatal Health Report. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013;67(12):983-5.
3. AQUA. Bundesauswertung Geburtshilfe 16/1 [Internet]. 2015 [zitiert 04.09.2017]. Verfügbar unter: https://sqg.de/downloads/Bundesauswertungen/2014/bu_Gesamt_16N1-GEBH_2014.pdf
4. Bonß W, Dimbath O, Maurer A, Nieder L, Pelizäus-Hoffmeister H, Schmid M. Handlungstheorie. Bielefeld: transcript; 2014.
5. Häußling R. Techniksoziologie. 1st ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verl.-Ges.; 2014.
6. Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;8: CD003934.
7. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:CD002006.
8. Kemp E, Kingswood CJ, Kibuka M, Thornton JG. Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;1:CD008070.
9. Dijkstra K, Pieterse M, Pruyn A. Physical environmental stimuli that turn healthcare facilities into healing environments through psychologically mediated effects: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006;56(2):166-81.
10. Janssen P, Klein M, Harris S, Soolsma J, Seymour L. Single room maternity care and client satisfaction. Birth 2000;27(4):235-43.
11. Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;8:CD000012.
12. Lorentzen I. Clinical Trial: Birth Environment of the Future [Internet]. Clinical Trials 2015 [zitiert 08.04.2017]. Verfügbar unter: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02478385
13. MASS Design Group and Ariadne Labs. Designing Capacity for High Value Healthcare: The impact of design on clinical care in childbirth [Internet]. Final Report. 2017 [zitiert 08.04.2017]. Verfügbar unter: https://massdesigngroup.org/work/research/impact-design-clinical-care-childbirth
14. Hodnett ED, Stremler R, Weston JA, McKeever P. Re-conceptualizing the hospital labor room: the PLACE pilot trial. Birth 2009;36(2):159-66.
15. Foureur M, Davis D, Fenwick J, Leap N, Iedema R, Forbes I, et al. The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery 2010;26(5):520-5.
16. Hammond A, Foureur M, Homer CS. The hardware and software implications of hospital birth room design: a midwifery perspective. Midwifery 2014;30(7):825-30.
17. Ayerle G. Preferences and deficits in midwifery care in Germany from the perspective of users and midwives: a qualitative explorative study [Internet] 2016 [zitiert 08.04.2017] Verfügbar unter: http://www.medizin.uni-halle.de/hebammenversorgung